Another user has been replying to an answer of mine (and downvoted it) based on false information. What he is arguing against is something that isn't up for debate, and has been scientifically proven countless time by elite medical research institutes. Here is the question:
Should users be allowed to spread false information like this? In this case the conclusions he's drawing could lead other users not to follow the scientifically accepted advice, which could lead to injury. I believe it would be irresponsible to allow this "debate" to continue. This isn't a skepticism SE.